Judah’s Confession: Absolution Is the Beginning of the Journey

For the final essay in this series, I want to step back from the Davidic narratives to consider David’s ancestor, Judah, in the book of Genesis. As you may recall, the patriarch Jacob had twelve sons, each representing a future tribe of Israel. Judah, the fourth son, holds particular significance because David eventually emerges from a city within Judah’s tribal territory. Since Judah serves as a “type” or “figure” for the royal line, it is fitting that he proves his leadership not through a show of power, but through a courageous display of contrition.

To understand the narrative’s intricacies, we must first examine the family of Jacob. The patriarch had two wives, Leah and Rachel, along with their respective maidservants, Zilpah and Bilhah. From these four women, Jacob fathered twelve sons. Joseph and Benjamin, the only sons of his preferred wife, Rachel, were naturally his favorites. In contrast, Judah was the fourth son of the less-favored Leah. This deep-seated favoritism toward Rachel’s children establishes the central tension that drives the beginning of our story:

Joseph, being seventeen years old, was shepherding the flock with his brothers; he was a lad with the sons of Bilhah and Zilpah, his father’s wives; and Joseph brought an ill report of them to their father. 3 Now Israel loved Joseph more than any other of his children, because he was the son of his old age; and he made him a long robe with sleeves. 4 But when his brothers saw that their father loved him more than all his brothers, they hated him, and could not speak peaceably to him (Gen 37:2-4).

This text underscores two critical catalysts for the coming crisis: Joseph’s immaturity and Jacob’s indulgence. Though only a lad of seventeen years, Joseph takes it upon himself to report the brother’s behavior to his father. In a word, he becomes a tattletale. Yet his father fails to correct or intervene in this troublesome and potentially divisive behavior. The reasons for Jacob’s failure are patent—Joseph is the first-born son of his favored wife.

Understandably, this preferential treatment fuels a slow-burning rage among the older brothers. However, Joseph seems to enjoy fanning these flames by revealing his dreams. His visions of celestial bodies and sheaves of wheat bowing down to him suggest a future of total domination and subjection over his elder siblings.

This sets the stage for the most significant event in the chapter.

12 Now his brothers went to pasture their father’s flock near Shechem. 13 And Israel said to Joseph, “Are not your brothers pasturing the flock at Shechem? Come, I will send you to them.” And he said to him, “Here I am.” 14 So he said to him, “Go now, see if it is well with your brothers, and with the flock; and bring me word again.” . . . So Joseph went after his brothers, and found them at Dothan. 18 They saw him afar off, and before he came near to them they conspired against him to kill him. 19 They said to one another, “Here comes this dreamer. 20 Come now, let us kill him and throw him into one of the pits; then we shall say that a wild beast has devoured him, and we shall see what will become of his dreams.” 21 But when Reuben heard it, he delivered him out of their hands, saying, “Let us not take his life.” 22 And Reuben said to them, “Shed no blood; cast him into this pit here in the wilderness, but lay no hand upon him”—that he might rescue him out of their hand, to restore him to his father. 23 So when Joseph came to his brothers, they stripped him of his robe, the long robe with sleeves that he wore; 24 and they took him and cast him into a pit. The pit was empty, there was no water in it.

25 Then they sat down to eat; and looking up they saw a caravan of Ishmaelites coming from Gilead, with their camels bearing gum, balm, and myrrh, on their way to carry it down to Egypt. 26 Then Judah said to his brothers, “What profit is it if we slay our brother and conceal his blood? 27 Come, let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother, our own flesh.” And his brothers heeded him. 28 Then Midianite traders passed by; and they drew Joseph up and lifted him out of the pit, and sold him to the Ishmaelites for twenty shekels of silver; and they took Joseph to Egypt (Gen 37:12-28).

What must be noted here is the brothers’ attempt to murder their brother. Though Reuben intervenes for a moment, his efforts are not completely successful. This prompts Judah to suggest that they sell Joseph into slavery. This way Joseph’s death—a very likely thing to happen as a result of serving as a slave to a foreign people—will not be the direct result of the brother’s own actions: “let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother, our own flesh.”

This narrative sequence culminates in the brothers’ explicit attempt to commit fratricide. While Reuben attempts to thwart these plans, his efforts are only partially successful. This prompts Judah to propose a different course: selling Joseph into slavery. By doing so, the brothers ensure that Joseph’s likely demise—a high probability for anyone sold into foreign servitude—is no longer a direct result of their own hands.[1] Judah’s reasoning, “let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother, our own flesh,” presents a chillingly pragmatic middle ground between murder and mercy.

Following the sale of Joseph into slavery, the brothers use his distinctive robe—once the primary symbol of their father’s favoritism—as the instrument of their deception. By dipping it in goat’s blood, they lead Jacob to the grim conclusion about his son’s fateful demise.

And [Jacob] recognized it, and said, “It is my son’s robe; a wild beast has devoured him; Joseph is without doubt torn to pieces.” 34 Then Jacob rent his garments, and put sackcloth upon his loins, and mourned for his son many days. 35 All his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted, and said, “No, I shall go down to Sheol to my son, mourning.” Thus his father wept for him (37:33-34).

In the subsequent chapters, the narrative follows Joseph’s ascent to prominence in Egypt. After successfully navigating Pharaoh through a seven-year famine by implementing a strategic grain storage plan, Joseph is eventually reunited with his family. This reunion provides Joseph with a critical opportunity to determine if his brothers still harbor the same lethal resentment toward their father and his remaining favored son, Benjamin.”

Joseph initiates a final, decisive test by planting his silver divination cup in Benjamin’s grain sack. When the “theft” is discovered, Joseph offers the brothers a way out: he will take Benjamin as a slave and allow the rest to return home in peace:

Then he commanded the steward of his house, “Fill the men’s sacks with food, as much as they can carry, and put each man’s money in the mouth of his sack, 2 and put my cup, the silver cup, in the mouth of the sack of the youngest, with his money for the grain.” And he did as Joseph told him. 3 As soon as the morning was light, the men were sent away with their asses. 4 When they had gone but a short distance from the city, Joseph said to his steward, “Up, follow after the men; and when you overtake them, say to them, ‘Why have you returned evil for good? Why have you stolen my silver cup? 5 Is it not from this that my lord drinks, and by this that he divines? You have done wrong in so doing’” (Gen 44:1-5).

The central question is now laid bare: what will the brothers do? If Benjamin fails to return, their father’s grief will likely be fatal, so great is his affection for the son of Rachel. Can the brothers transcend their historical animosity to preserve their father and restore the unity of the family?

When Judah and his brothers came to Joseph’s house, he was still there; and they fell before him to the ground. 15 Joseph said to them, “What deed is this that you have done? Do you not know that such a man as I can indeed divine?” 16 And Judah said, “What shall we say to my lord? What shall we speak? Or how can we clear ourselves? God has found out the guilt of your servants; behold, we are my lord’s slaves, both we and he also in whose hand the cup has been found.” 17 But he said, “Far be it from me that I should do so! Only the man in whose hand the cup was found shall be my slave; but as for you, go up in peace to your father” (Gen 44:14-17).

Now we have come to the moment of truth. Joseph has turned the clock back to the events of Genesis 37, the beginning of our story. There, you will recall, the favoritism of Jacob for Rachel’s first-born son caused the jealous rage of the brothers and the attempted murder of Joseph. Now the brothers have a far better option: they can get rid of the second and last favored son, Benjamin without having any blood on their hands. They can let this Egyptian vizier have his way with him. How will they respond? Judah will step forward and show us.

We have arrived at the moment of truth. Joseph has effectively wound back the clock to the events of Genesis 37. In that earlier chapter, Jacob’s blatant favoritism toward Rachel’s firstborn ignited a jealous rage that nearly ended in Joseph’s murder. Now, the brothers are presented with an even “better” option: they can eliminate Benjamin—the last favored son—without taking any aggressive action. As a silence hangs in the Egyptian court, it is Judah who finally breaks it, stepping forward to offer a response that will change the course of their family history.

Let us turn now to one of the most remarkable speeches in the entire Bible.

Then Judah went up to him and said, “O my lord, let your servant, I pray you, speak a word in my lord’s ears, and let not your anger burn against your servant; for you are like Pharaoh himself. 19 My lord asked his servants, saying, ‘Have you a father, or a brother?’ 20 And we said to my lord, ‘We have a father, an old man, and a young brother, the child of his old age; and his brother is dead, and he alone is left of his mother’s children; and his father loves him’” (Gen 44:18-20).

Two critical points emerge from this dramatic opening:

1. The Irony of Death: Judah speaks to Joseph while operating under the firm belief that Joseph is dead (referencing the sale in Gen 37:26-27). This adds a layer of profound dramatic irony to the scene.

2. The Transformation of Motive: Remarkably, the very reasons Judah cites for saving Benjamin—his father’s unique love for the son of his old age—are the exact factors that fueled the brothers’ murderous hatred in Chapter 37! What once incited violence now inspires a plea for mercy.

Continuing with Judah’s words:

Then you said to your servants, ‘Bring him down to me, that I may set my eyes upon him.’ 22 We said to my lord, ‘The lad cannot leave his father, for if he should leave his father, his father would die.’ 23 Then you said to your servants, ‘Unless your youngest brother comes down with you, you shall see my face no more.’ 24 When we went back to your servant my father we told him the words of my lord. 25 And when our father said, ‘Go again, buy us a little food,’ 26 we said, ‘We cannot go down. If our youngest brother goes with us, then we will go down; for we cannot see the man’s face unless our youngest brother is with us.’ 27 Then your servant my father said to us, ‘You know that my wife bore me two sons; 28 one left me, and I said, Surely he has been torn to pieces; and I have never seen him since. 29 If you take this one also from me, and harm befalls him, you will bring down my gray hairs in sorrow to Sheol’ (vv. 21-29).

In these verses, the author reveals a complex layering of substitutions embedded within the narrative. As biblical scholar Jon Levenson observes:

Judah will be the substitute for Benjamin, accepting upon himself the slavery to which Joseph has sentenced his younger brother. But Benjamin is himself a substitute, standing in for that other beloved son and child of Rachel and Jacob’s old age, Joseph (44:20; 37:3). And Joseph and Benjamin are both, in some deeper sense, substitutes for their father and thus paradigms for the people Israel. . . . This is because, as Judah puts it with reference to Jacob and Benjamin, ‘his own life is bound up with his (44:30).’”[2]

This chain of substitutions underscores the shift in Judah’s character. He is no longer worried about his own place in the hierarchy of the family. He has come to realize that his father’s very life is inextricably linked to Benjamin, and that the family’s survival depends on this fact. Accordingly, he can now make his radical proposal:

Now therefore, when I come to your servant my father, and the lad is not with us, then, as his life is bound up in the lad’s life, 31 when he sees that the lad is not with us, he will die; and your servants will bring down the gray hairs of your servant our father with sorrow to Sheol. 32 For your servant became surety for the lad to my father, saying, ‘If I do not bring him back to you, then I shall bear the blame in the sight of my father all my life.’ 33 Now therefore, let your servant, I pray you, remain instead of the lad as a slave to my lord; and let the lad go back with his brothers. 34 For how can I go back to my father if the lad is not with me? I fear to see the evil that would come upon my father” (Gen 44:30-34).

These concluding verses serve as the structural and moral keystone of the entire Joseph cycle. By offering to take Benjamin’s place—accepting a life of Egyptian servitude—Judah has finally atoned for his earlier crime of selling Joseph. He effectively stands in the place of the one who had taken Joseph’s place. This act also repairs his offense against Jacob; Judah now chooses a lifetime of slavery for himself rather than witness his father “brought down to Sheol in grief.”

The profound paradox here is that this very willingness to sacrifice himself is what finally breaks the family’s long-standing impasse. Because Judah is willing to be enslaved, Joseph can finally drop his disguise. In the end, neither brother is enslaved, yet Jacob is fully redeemed from his “death-like state” of perpetual mourning, allowing the fractured family to finally achieve reconciliation.[3]

This brings us to the close of this series on the forgiveness of sins. Throughout these narratives, we have seen that both Judah and David resolve the crises precipitated by their transgressions through acts of radical sacrifice. For David, this meant surrendering his royal office and placing his future entirely in the hands of God. For Judah, it was the selfless decision to preserve the integrity of his family, even at the cost of his own liberty and life.

In neither case were we merely observing the “karmic” wheels of justice crushing sinners under foot. Rather, we witnessed the transformative power of God, who used moments of chastisement to correct and repair the grave errors that threatened the very existence of Israel. Ultimately, as the Catechism teaches, making satisfaction for one’s sins is an act of restoration and grace—one that must never be confused with mere punishment. Because forgiveness is a process of restoration—“deification” in the language of the Eastern Church—it should not be thought of as a mere punctiliar moment. For the Catholic, once the words of absolution are spoken, the journey with Christ gathers new strength—a journey that will not end until our lives are fully conformed to his.[4]

EDITORIAL NOTE: This essay is adapted from the sixth installment of the McGrath Institute’s six-part Lenten Illuminating Scripture series, which you can watch in its entirety below.

Church Life Journal | Articles

Tags: Absolution Beginning Confession Journey Judah's