The Stories We Live By: Myth, Reason, and the Search for the Good Life

Human beings live by stories. This is the oldest human truth, yet the one modern culture most quickly forgets. This is not poetic metaphor but anthropological fact. Long before the rise of modern philosophy or scientific rationalism, cultures understood that narrative is the architecture of consciousness—that stories give form to desire, identity, and moral imagination. Even today, in an age saturated with data and algorithms, we remain, as cognitive scientist Justin Barrett argues, “born believers,” naturally attuned to agents, teleology, and purpose.[1] We are not “blank slates.” Our minds instinctively detect agency in the world, seek patterns and purposes in nature, and imagine powers beyond the visible. Barrett’s point is not that children are born Christians, Muslims, or Buddhists. Rather, we are born with a god-shaped receptivity—a conceptual longing for agency, purpose, and teleology that culture later fills with particular forms. This is not superstition to be overcome but a fundamental feature of human cognition—one that shapes how we encounter reality itself. In other words, we begin life not as little materialists but as seekers.

The modern assumption that stories are mere entertainment—or worse, primitive attempts at science—betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the human condition. Every young adult arrives at college with a worldview, whether they know it or not. A worldview is not simply an intellectual construction but, as James Sire reminds us, “a commitment, a fundamental orientation of the heart, that can be expressed as a story or in a set of presuppositions about the basic constitution of reality, and that provides the foundation on which we live and move and have our being.”[2] We hold these presuppositions consciously or unconsciously, consistently or inconsistently. They shape what we see, what we value, and who we become.

A worldview is composed of answers—implicit or explicit—to life’s great questions: What is ultimately real? Where did everything come from? What is a human being? What is the good life? How should we live together? What happens after death? Why do beauty, goodness, and truth matter? Ancient civilizations gave these answers through myth; philosophers told them through argument; religions expressed them through liturgy, symbol, and sacred text. Human beings cannot live without some interpretation of the world—some narrative horizon in which their lives take shape.

Yet today, many young people float among fragments—bits of inherited morality, isolated scientific facts, streaming narratives, memes, political slogans, spiritual intuitions, digital habits—all forming a hazy, incoherent picture of reality. They possess a worldview without knowing it. Their deepest convictions operate below the level of conscious reflection. Their minds have been shaped by digital culture, consumer capitalism, pop philosophy, and late-modern suspicion of all authority. They inhabit a world that tells them: truth is subjective. Freedom is limitless choice. Meaning is constructed. Success is self-promotion. Identity is performance. Reality is raw material.

And yet—beneath these slogans—there remains the deeper human intuition that the world is meaningful, that goodness and beauty are real, and that life is more than the sum of our choices. This is what C.S. Lewis called sehnucht, that inconsolable longing within us for we know not what.[3] This institution is also the beginning of Intellectual Foundations, a course I teach at Carthage College. As I state in its syllabus, the course “unfolds along three trajectories of inquiry that have commanded human attention since consciousness first turned upon itself in wonder.” My task is not to impose a story, but to make their existing worldview visible, to help them examine it, test it, inhabit it consciously, or—if necessary—exchange it for a better one. This is the work of awakening.

The Examined Life

Long before modern psychology, Socrates insisted that the fundamental task of life is to know yourself. In Plato’s dialogues, self-knowledge is not introspection but anthropology: to know the human self, one must know the human telos—the purpose or end for which we are made. In the Apology, Socrates stands before the Athenians accused of impiety, sophistry, and corrupting the youth. His response is startling in a secular age: he claims a divine vocation. The oracle at Delphi has announced that no one is wiser than Socrates—a judgment Socrates tests and eventually interprets as a mission to expose false wisdom. But his deeper point is even more radical: philosophy is not merely an intellectual pursuit but a preparation for death.[4]

In the Phaedo, Socrates explains to Simmias and Cebes that those who practice philosophy “are trying to prepare themselves for dying and death.” This is not a morbid obsession. It is a way of speaking about detachment, discernment, and the purification of desire. The philosopher seeks the truth and trains the soul to perceive reality beyond the illusions of bodily passions, social status, and civic acclaim. To philosophize is to learn how to live—and therefore how to die.[5]

French philosopher Pierre Hadot reads Plato precisely this way. He famously argued that ancient philosophy was not an abstract intellectual game but a spiritual exercise designed to transform life, reorder desire, and prepare the soul for truth.[6] Philosophy, in its original sense, was a way of life—a set of practices aimed at existential transformation. To philosophize was to practice death—to detach from illusions, to purify one’s vision, to reorient one’s desires toward the true and the good. Socrates’ calm acceptance of death is not bravado; it is the fruit of a life devoted to the examined life, the care of the soul, and the pursuit of truth more precious than survival. Schools like the Stoics, Epicureans, Platonists, and Aristotelians were more like communities of transformation than academic departments. They formed souls. The philosopher, then, is not an academic specialist but, as Simplicius put it, “a sculptor of men.” Plato and Aristotle can be imagined only “dressed in the long robes of priests,” Hadot notes, because their teaching was inseparable from their living. To learn philosophy was not to master a set of doctrines but to be initiated into a form of life—a way of seeing, judging, and desiring. In short, before philosophy became a “discipline,” it was a “conversion.”

Socrates taught that the greatest good is not wealth, pleasure, power, fame, or honor, but arete—excellence or virtue, understood not as mere good deeds but as good character. The key to the good life resides in the soul, and thus the fundamental task of existence is care of the soul. This care is not therapeutic self-help but rigorous discipline—what the ancient philosophers called memento mori, “remember that you have to die.” Philosophy, properly practiced, is preparation for death, the stripping away of illusions, the cultivation of what is eternal within us.

This is why Socrates remains the archetype of the philosopher. In the Apology, he declares that “the unexamined life is not worth living.” This is not a rebuke but an invitation: to awaken from distraction into meaning. And because “the soul is immortal,” he teaches, “no evil can happen to a good person in this world or the next.”[7] The good person is the one whose soul is rightly ordered—whose loves are properly directed toward the true, the good, and the beautiful. Socrates does not mean that life requires abstract theorizing. Rather, life requires wakefulness—a refusal to drift through existence asleep.

For students, this comes as a shock. They have never been told that philosophy has anything to do with living well, and even less that it has something to do with dying well. Yet this Socratic insight becomes the backbone of the entire Intellectual Foundations curriculum: the examined life is not an elective; it is the condition of human flourishing.

The Hierarchy of Being

Plato, Socrates’s greatest student, spent his life articulating this vision more systematically. He opposed the intellectual fashions of his day: hedonism (the pursuit of pleasure as the highest good), empiricism (the notion that sense experience alone yields truth), relativism (the claim that truth is merely subjective), materialism (the belief that only physical things exist), mechanism (the view that the universe is purposeless), atheism, and naturalism (the reduction of reality to nature alone). Against all these, Plato argued for a hierarchical cosmos: a world of changing, imperfect particulars pointing upward to eternal, perfect Forms—geometrical truths, Beauty, Justice, Truth—and ultimately to the Form of the Good, the source and summit of all reality.

This was not merely theoretical. Plato believed in three profound dualisms that shape human life. First, a metaphysical dualism: two levels of reality—the imperfect, changing, temporal, material world against the perfect, unchanging, eternal, immaterial world of the Forms. Second, an epistemological dualism: the distinction between mere opinion (based on sense experience) and genuine knowledge (attained by reason). Third, an anthropological dualism: the soul is not reducible to the body but is immortal, and its care is the meaning of existence.

Plato’s claim that “learning is remembering” may strike modern readers as strange, but its meaning resonates with contemporary cognitive science and timeless educational ideals. For Plato, the soul has an innate affinity with truth. Knowledge is not alien information imported into the mind; it is the awakening of latent insight. We recognize justice, beauty, goodness—not as arbitrary conventions—but as real features of the world because our souls are attuned to them.

Plato’s vision provides a vivid conceptual map of reality: the world of sense experience is a realm of particulars—changing, imperfect, contingent, finite. Beneath and beyond this world is the realm of Forms—geometrical truths, moral realities, Beauty, Justice, Goodness. Above all stands the Form of the Good, the source of all being and intelligibility. To live well one must understand this structure of reality. Hedonism, materialism, relativism, mechanism—all the philosophical errors Plato opposes—fail because they mistake the shadows for the substance. They reduce human beings to bodies, truth to opinion, morality to preference, purpose to pleasure.

Plato’s aim is not to impose metaphysical dogma but to turn the soul around, to reorient it from the flickering surfaces of life to the deeper truths they merely reflect. Education is this turning—what later Christian thinkers will call conversion.

Modern young adults live under immense pressure to perform—to curate, optimize, monetize, and self-present. Plato’s call to care for the soul is therefore radical: it returns the student to the question of what kind of person they are becoming, not what they can achieve or prove.

The Hunger for Meaning

Ancient philosophers did not orient their listeners toward argumentation but toward the “love of wisdom”—toward what Victorian cultural critic Matthew Arnold, in “The Buried Life” (1852), called the “unspeakable desire” beneath the distractions of ordinary life:

But often, in the world’s most crowded streets,
But often, in the din of strife,
There rises an unspeakable desire
After the knowledge of our buried life;
A thirst to spend our fire and restless force
In tracking out our true, original course.

Arnold begins one of his most haunting poems with an admission modern students instinctively recognize: the gnawing sense that beneath the noise and velocity of modern existence lies a deeper question—whence our lives come and where they go. This is not idle curiosity. It is the fundamental human longing to know ourselves, to understand the meaning of our existence, to discover our place in the larger story of reality. Philosophy begins not with a syllogism but with a sigh—a yearning, a restlessness, a sense that the life we are living is not quite the life we were made for. Arnold calls it “the buried life,” that subterranean stream of longing that flows beneath our practiced ironies, our cultivated indifference, our distraction-saturated modernity. That phrase, drawn from a Victorian poet who never attended a seminar on metaphysics, nonetheless captures the essence of the intellectual life.

Arnold’s poem is an arresting way to begin a college course because eighteen-year-olds know exactly what he means. They may not articulate it in verse, but they have felt the “nameless sadness” and the sudden “unspeakable desire” for “knowledge of our buried life.” The modern world tells us we are free from stories, that we can assemble our identities from fragments of media, algorithmic recommendations, and lifestyle brands. But this supposed liberation leaves us inwardly divided—full of yearning, caught in distraction, restless and unrooted. Beneath the noise of everyday life stirs “a something that we cannot name,” a longing for meaning that remains unmet in our culture’s thin narrative of autonomy and self-invention. This longing is not an illusion. It is the signal of a spiritual need.

It bears repeating. Modernity often strips stories of their sacred power. We live, as cultural observer Tara Burton notes, in “a profoundly anti-institutional age, where the proliferation of internet creative culture and consumer capitalism have rendered us all simultaneously parishioner, high priest, and deity.”[8] We are told to invent ourselves, choose our own meanings, and treat narratives as consumer options in an infinite marketplace of identity. But this supposed liberation is a form of exile. Without a story, desire becomes arbitrary. Freedom collapses into domination. Morality becomes incoherent. Meaning grows thin.

The consequences are visible everywhere. Young adults entering college today inherit this fragmentation. They are surrounded by choices, technologies, and economic pressures but starved for a coherent picture of reality or a sustaining vision of the good. They know how to curate personas on social media but struggle to answer the most basic questions: What is a human being? Why is it possible to know anything at all? How do we know what is right and wrong? What is the meaning of human history? These are not abstract puzzles but existential urgencies.

What they need—what all human beings need—is not merely information but formation. Ralph Waldo Emerson understood this when he wrote that the task of the teacher is not to instruct but to awaken. This awakening is the opposite of indoctrination; it is liberation—the mind realizing that the world is richer, deeper, stranger, and more beautiful than it ever suspected. Education, properly understood, is not the transfer of data but the turning of the soul—a reorientation toward truth, beauty, and goodness.[9]

Education at its best is not a technical procedure but a spiritual event—an encounter with truth that reconfigures the self. Modernity’s tragedy is that its young people are drowning in information but starving for wisdom. They possess facts in abundance but lack the inner orientation, trained perception, and disciplined attention necessary to interpret their lives. They are formed by screens, trends, and markets, but not by the great stories that humanized entire civilizations.

Philosophy Begins in Wonder

It is here that the ancient insight about wonder becomes crucial. Plato taught that “philosophy begins in wonder.”[10] Aristotle echoed this in the Metaphysics: “For men were first led to study philosophy, as indeed they are today, by wonder. Now, he who is perplexed and wonders believes himself to be ignorant . . . they took to philosophy to escape ignorance.”[11]

Wonder is not mere curiosity. It is the recognition that reality exceeds our grasp, that there is more to the world than surfaces and utilities, that genuine questions remain. Wonder is the antidote to cynicism. It is the opposite of boredom. It is the condition of insight. Indeed, as G.K. Chesterton famously said, the world does not lack wonders but wonderers.[12] To educate, then, is to cultivate this wonder—to guard it against premature cynicism, ideological closure, or consumerist distraction. To begin with wonder is to admit that the world is not obvious—that reality is a mystery to be contemplated, not a mechanism to be manipulated. Wonder awakens humility, curiosity, and the desire for wisdom.

The task of the intellectual life—indeed, the task of the human life—is to awaken to the story we are in. Young adults today do not need more information. They need initiation. They need companions on the journey toward wisdom. They need myths fit for adults—stories capacious enough to ground moral reasoning, sustain courage, and illuminate the meaning of existence. Barrett’s research demonstrates that human minds are “hyperactive agency detectors”; we naturally infer purpose, intention, and design. Young children interpret the world teleologically. They see meaning everywhere.

Modern adults do too—they simply suppress or sublimate their intuitions. This does not prove any particular religious tradition, but it does suggest that human beings are built for story, transcendence, and moral vision. We are, in Barrett’s phrase, “born believers”—not credulous, but meaning-seeking. Philosophy, then, is not an escape from myth but the rational refinement of our deepest narrative instincts.

An Invitation to the Journey

Students need an intellectual pilgrimage, a journey through the great stories that shaped civilizations and revealed what it means to be human. This journey is not a neutral tour through “world religions” or “great ideas” but a guided exploration of how different narratives imagine the cosmos, the human person, and the good life. Some of these stories conflict. Some complement. Some illuminate. Some distort. The point is not to stand above them all in detached judgment but to engage them seriously, to let them question us even as we question them, and ultimately to ask: Which story is true? Which story can bear the weight of a life?

Church Life Journal | Articles

Tags: Good Life live Myth Reason Search Stories